Identification Is Not the Problem
Nor is it going awayβbut within it appears a practical path for the seeker
My teacher once said that if he could receive a single wish, he would ask for a day without identification. βJust to know how it feels,β he added.
Identification, a concept most sharply developed in the work of spiritual philosopher G.I. Gurdjieff (1866-1949) and also heard in Buddhism and other traditions, means associating self with thing, such as career or money.
I note two things in my teacherβs statement:
I believe he meant it. He was more committed to the search than I am.
He dedicated his life to the search. If identification seemed so entrenched to him, consider what any seeker faces.
But I wonder: if identificationβself as thingβis implacable, or practically so, can it be considered a problem? Or, is identification innate to the human situation, like the need for shelter?
Rather than eluding identification, there may exist a different approach; one that acknowledges the suffering of fixationβwhile transmuting it.




