Friends, As some of you know, I maintain correspondence with inmates. I am reproducingβwith the correspondentβs permissionβa letter of July 26, 2025, from Mike who is incarcerated in Washington State. For those who do not read his full letter, note this passage: βI was thinking the other day about the Hermetic principle βas above, so below.β Can we take that and say, if one individual experiences something, isnβt that experience imprinted on the Nous, a tiny piece of the evolution of consciousness? Is it more effective based on the number of individuals experiencing it? Maybe, but wouldnβt it be more important to have one true message than a million false ones?β
* * *
7/26/25
Dear Mitch,
Thank you so much for your openness in your letter. It is quite refreshing. In my experience, it is rare for people to be vulnerable with each other, especially when holding positions of power or prestige which draw many eyes. So I deeply appreciate your being willing to show that side of yourself with me. It is no burden at all, and Iβve learned to see everyoneβs struggles as very real and defining to them. Plus, Iβll never work as a therapist again, but I can still listen to a friend and try to be there for them in whatever way I can, right?
I can only imagine how busy youβve been and the pressure that comes with that, though you certainly seem to manage it well based on the work you put out. I can certainly resonate with the identity-crisis struggle, and how scary that can be. Like any other apocalypse, I supposed itβs also a time of great change, letting go of what no longer works, accepting the new and often unexpected; sure feels like shit in the middle of it, though.
I hear the dilemma around outer goals and inner work. Iβve spent a lot of time debating in my head what the best balance is there. Iβve mostly been around people who tout βinner work creates outer change,β and I certainly want to believe that, and can see much truth in it, yet itβs not that simple, of course, is it? At the end of the day, we do still live in a material realm. And if I have some amazing idea that no one else likes or ends up benefiting from, is it truly valuable, or am I just deluding myself?
Iβm unsure if this is helpful at all, but I suppose the best I can do is reflect to you how I see your work. I appreciate your writing because you bring a well-researched, scientific, yet open-minded approach to spiritual topics, which many professionals shy away from due to the potential reputation hazards youβve pointed out in some of your books. Now, Iβm not much for mainstream anything, and Iβve spent most of my adult life venting uselessly about how unethical our healthcare system has become. (I was a CT scan tech for about 15 years before I became a therapist) in that itβs run by businessmen and insurance tycoons. That being said, I still want to get paid for my work in hospitals and be able to afford a mortgage.
The entertainment world may be different, but not entirely. The mind-numbing repetitious reality shows, the focus on numbers of eyes translating to advertising value, most of which is for medications people donβt really need (looping back to the healthcare system), all adding up to an effort to simply pump out whatever the marketing pros with their rudimentary knowledge of psychology say is most likely to get the average Joe addicted to watching, regardless of ethical value. Blah, shoot me. We have fifty-some channels of basic cable to watch in here, and I can only stand one of them: PBS. That may be the most geriatric comment Iβve ever made.
What Iβm trying to say is, your content is not fast food, and thatβs what I love about it. If the majority of the public audience is too busy watching Jerry Springer and the countless spinoffs of that trash to spend time viewing or reading about breakthroughs in quantum mechanics and ESP, screw βem! I hate the numbers game, yet I understand it and am in no place to judge others for doing what it takes to pay the bills. I suppose itβs a terribly rote anecdote in your line of work but itβs still true that many of the most famous authors and artists werenβt famous until after their deaths, isnβt it? I will say this: if you were to compromise your ethics and motive behind your work to achieve improved numbers, I would move away from your work, grateful for what you have done up to that point, and hope someone else half as good as you comes along.
So maybe thatβs part of the question here? I know youβve shared your aim as βfame,β but is fame necessarily dependent on numbers? What if youβre famous with a fringe crowd but never achieve widespread notoriety? Some of my favorite bands put out amazing first albums, then got signed onto big labels and started sounding like everyone else. Also, ironically my favorite songs on the album are never the ones theyβre famous for.
I was thinking the other day about the Hermetic principle βas above, so below.β Can we take that and say, if one individual experiences something, isnβt that experience imprinted on the Nous, a tiny piece of the evolution of consciousness? Is it more effective based on the number of individuals experiencing it? Maybe, but wouldnβt it be more important to have one true message than a million false ones?
I admire your work ethic, and I empathize with having to make sacrifices at times, I just hope you donβt fall prey to sacrificing who you are for any perceived external result. At least, thatβs my humble two cents. Oh, and if my perception of the entertainment industry is way, just chalk it up to a guy who has spent too long in a jail cell!
I can absolutely agree that the focus on inner work cannot be a consolation prize, though. I have seen quite a bit of that as well and have to watch that in myself with my change in circumstances. It stuck out to me that speaking in public brings you the most joy. Sounds like the heart talking. I deeply hope I can attend one of your presentations one day.
Thank you again for sharing part of yourself with me. As a fan and friend, I just want to close by saying, βkeep doing what youβre doing!β I have faith in your mission and so do many others.
Good luck with the projects and take care my friend!
Mike
_____________
I send any of my books free to any incarcerate in the United States. You can make a request with the institutional address via email. Your contribution helps support this effort.
I think this is such a valuable question and I appreciate the writer and you for sharing it. It got me thinking. Not just as audience or human but also as an artist. Can the message/work rise above the noise without being compromised? And how can it even survive the noise with so much money and energy flowing in what we view as counter to it? Can we redirect the "flow"? The ultimate question: do we have to sell out? I think maybe it comes down to the distinction between rich and famous or famous...and if they are mutually exclusive ( beyond cases of posterity.) I don't know. I think money as an artist is important even if we don't want to admit it or soley create for it...we exist in a world built around it. I want my kids to have access in ways I don't and if my work is creative ...than I have to honor that tension. I came to Substack to try to create something that might one day be monetarily valuable...but I am hoping by creating it myself I can maintain the integrity of it...but I think ultimately...it's can we bypass large institutions and still be successful? It's rare but not impossible.Maybe? I think ultimately it comes down to what we feel we need personally, to provide safety in a world that can be unsafe if we don't have money...as an artist. And then how much do money do we truly need vs. what we think we need. Do we have to be starving to be real artists? I can create and write and have joy and all love without money...but as a human living in this present time... I can't survive much longer without it. So the dilemma becomes very real. So at ground level...What amount of fame/fortune is enough for me to get by?...and then if one day if I even have the luxury of "selling out"...what am I willing to sell/compromise to get my message out, before that message becomes potentially dilluted by money (and also bigger audiences of opinions/assumptions that money equals comrpomising artistic value)....and I hope...maybe naively that maybe there may be a space...whether on substack or beyond where I don't have to be "sponsored" but supported directly from those who value my craft. Like a buddhist I hope to find a middle path. I am always trying to walk it...but I can see the level of balance and self awarness it takes not to stumble. So "as above so below" becomes crucial in both creation & navigation.
I love the reflection here. Tonight, on a video about artistic originality, I saw Bowie talk of being a magpie of inspiration, talking all he could and folding it into his work, then the same video had him talk of the power of The Velvet Underground and how they invented modern rock. It made me realise Iβd be happier being The Velvets than I would Taylor Swift (and I am a staunch Swiftie). Iβd rather be Vonnegut than Colleen Hoover.